Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM55614
Volume:
9 |
12 |
Dec 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Agile methodologies have become a dominant approach in software development due to their emphasis on flexibility, rapid delivery, and continuous improvement. However, many organizations operate in environments where agile practices coexist with traditional project management structures, leading to the adoption of hybrid project environments. Despite their widespread use, limited empirical research evaluates the effectiveness of agile practices within such hybrid settings using objective organizational data. This paper presents a comparative empirical analysis of three technology companies representing agile, traditional, and hybrid project management approaches. Using publicly available organizational data, the study examines key performance indicators including revenue growth trends, release cycle frequency, and employee satisfaction metrics. The comparative analysis highlights how organizations adopting hybrid approaches that integrate agile practices achieve delivery performance and workforce engagement levels comparable to predominantly agile organizations, while retaining the stability and governance associated with traditional models. The findings provide data-driven insights into the effectiveness of agile methodologies in hybrid project environments and support the view that hybrid approaches offer a practical balance between adaptability and control in complex organizational contexts
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/29/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...