Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM40626
Volume:
9 |
1 |
Jan 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The credibility and clarity of electoral systems are vital for maintaining the public’s confidence in democratic governance. However, there are significant problems with traditional voting methods, including the possibility of fraud, a lack of transparency, and delays in results announcement and verification. This study addresses these enduring problems by putting forth a unique blockchain-based electoral voting mechanism. Blockchain functions as an immutable, decentralized digital ledger that can guarantee that every vote is safe, private, and open to public auditing. The suggested architecture uses smart contracts for automated and tamper-proof vote storage, incorporates robust cryptographic techniques for voter authentication, and uses consensus procedures for decentralized result verification. In terms of data security, system efficiency, and scalability, a blockchain-based solution outperforms current techniques, according to a comparison with traditional and electronic voting models. Practical issues including scale, accessibility for various demographics, and regulatory framework adaptation are also covered in the study. In the end, the results confirm that blockchain has the potential to transform electoral processes in the future by bringing in more dependable, transparent, and secure technologies.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/4/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...