Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:10.55041/IJSREM16429

Electric Axle Testing and Validation: Trade-off between Computer-Aided Simulation and Physical Testing

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

10.55041/IJSREM16429

Volume:

6 |

9 |

Sep 2022

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM16429

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

SP

Siddhesh Pimpale

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

To develop and validate the testing of electric axle systems, a strong testing methodology optimally balances CAE and actual testing. CAE provides a cost- and time-efficient tool for evaluating design parameters in the hands of a manufacturer who is optimizing structures, predicting which likely failure model to use, and improving the overall performance of the system. CAE simulations use sophisticated computational models such as finite element analysis (FEA) and multi-body dynamics (MBD) to assess not only the structural integrity but also the thermal management and efficiency of a system without the need for any physical prototypes. Nevertheless, due to the fact that real-world accuracy and reliability cannot be guaranteed without physical testing, progression in CAE does not imply the end of physical validation. Material inconsistency, variation of an environment from that assumed, and unforeseen mechanical interactions are extremely potent differentiating factors. Physical testing applies engineering commentary on CAE predictions, pinpoints unforeseen issues, and feeds back into design to enhance durability and safety. However, physical testing could prove to be expensive and time- consuming, outlaying consumable materials for testing; besides, it is also energetically expensive. In the present article, we will consider the compromise between the two methodologies and weigh their advantages and disadvantages. While CAE offers methods to save cost and reduce waste, physical tests guarantee the verification of realistic operating conditions. A complementary method integrating the combination of CAE and physical testing will maximize the electric axle validation by exploiting the CAE capabilities for predictive purposes, while being confirmed with real-world feasibility through concentrated experimental corroboration. This hybrid approach results in better efficiency, shorter time for development cycles, and goes a long way to promoting sustainability in the automotive industry. Implementation of a mildly balanced framework for validation assures manufacturers of high-performing, durable, and environmentally friendly electric axle systems.

KEYWORDS

Electric axle validation computer-aided engineering (CAE) physical testing finite element analysis (FEA) multi-body dynamics (MBD) simulation vs

Cite This Article

Siddhesh Pimpale, "Electric Axle Testing and Validation: Trade-off between Computer-Aided Simulation and Physical Testing," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 6, no. 9, Sep 2022. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM16429

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/26/2022

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

12

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...