Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM52245
Volume:
9 |
8 |
Aug 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Detecting healthcare fraud is a complex and continually evolving challenge, particularly due to the difficulties posed by imbalanced datasets. Traditional machine learning (ML) approaches have been widely explored in past research but often struggle with data imbalance. Techniques such as Random Oversampling (ROS) can lead to overfitting, SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique) may introduce noise, and Random Undersampling (RUS) can result in the loss of critical information. To address these limitations, it is essential to enhance model accuracy through advanced resampling methods and improved evaluation metrics. This study introduces an innovative strategy for addressing data imbalance in healthcare fraud detection, focusing on the Medicare Part B dataset. Initially, the categorical feature “Provider Type” is extracted and used to increase minority class variety by replicating existing entries. Following this, a hybrid technique known as SMOTE-ENN—combining SMOTE with Edited Nearest Neighbors (ENN)—is implemented. This approach not only generates synthetic samples but also filters out noisy data, leading to a more balanced and cleaner dataset. We evaluate six different ML models using standard metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and the AUC-ROC curve, with additional emphasis on the Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) due to its effectiveness in imbalanced settings. Experimental results demonstrate that the Decision Tree classifier outperforms all others, achieving an exceptional 0.99 score across all evaluation metrics.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/28/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...