Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM59485

Evolving Trade Blocs and Geopolitical Risk: Qualitative Narratives and Visual Meaning

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM59485

Volume:

10 |

4 |

April 2026

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM59485

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

"B

"Abineet Bazal"

HR

Harshit Rana

MS

Manjeet Singh

DGS

Dr.Krishan Gopal Soin

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

The contemporary global economy is undergoing a major transformation as evolving trade blocs increasingly influence international political and economic relations. In recent years, trade arrangements and regional alliances have expanded beyond their traditional function of reducing trade barriers and promoting economic integration. They now operate as instruments of strategic influence, geopolitical positioning, and geoeconomic competition in a world marked by fragmentation, multipolarity, and shifting power balances. This study examines how new and changing trade blocs affect global political and economic relationships and how geopolitical risks connected to these blocs are explained through qualitative narratives and visual representations. The study adopts a qualitative secondary-data approach and draws upon academic literature, institutional trade data, geopolitical risk datasets, policy reports, media discourse, maps, charts, and infographics to analyse both the structural and representational dimensions of the topic. The analysis shows that evolving trade blocs shape global relations by altering diplomatic alignments, market access, supply-chain configurations, investment patterns, and strategic dependencies among states. These blocs create new spaces for regional cooperation while also intensifying competition, selective alignment, and economic fragmentation. The study further finds that geopolitical risk associated with trade blocs is not merely an objective consequence of conflict, sanctions, strategic rivalry, or economic instability, but also a socially constructed and communicatively mediated phenomenon. Policy discourse, media narratives, and institutional commentary frame trade blocs in varying ways, presenting them as mechanisms of cooperation, instruments of balancing, or sources of tension and uncertainty. Similarly, visual representations such as maps, charts, dashboards, and media visuals simplify complex geopolitical realities and shape how risks are interpreted by audiences. These representational forms influence public understanding and policy perception by highlighting certain patterns while downplaying others. The study concludes that evolving trade blocs must be understood through a dual lens: as material structures within the global economy and as representational objects within geopolitical discourse. Their significance lies not only in their institutional and economic functions but also in the narratives and visuals through which they are made meaningful. In doing so, the study offers a more integrated understanding of the relationship between trade architecture, geopolitical risk, and the politics of representation in an increasingly uncertain global order.

KEYWORDS

Trade blocs geopolitical risk geoeconomic fragmentation narrative framing visual geopolitics global trade multipolarity

Cite This Article

"Abineet Bazal", Harshit Rana, Manjeet Singh, Dr.Krishan Gopal Soin, "Evolving Trade Blocs and Geopolitical Risk: Qualitative Narratives and Visual Meaning," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 4, April 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM59485

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

7/3/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

0

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...