Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM52872
Volume:
9 |
10 |
Oct 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This research explores how an experiential approach to teaching Physics influences secondary school students’ affective learning dimensions, namely engagement, confidence, interest, and their sense of the subject’s relevance. A quasi-experimental design using pre-test and post-test measures with control and experimental groups was employed. Participants included 66 Grade 10 students from a CBSE-affiliated school, evenly assigned to traditional instruction (control) and experiential instruction (treatment). Over a period of six months, the experimental group engaged in inquiry-based tasks, collaborative projects, and practical experiments directly linked to curriculum topics. A structured Likert-scale survey was used to assess students’ attitudes across the four domains at both stages. Findings indicated minimal variation in the control group, whereas the experimental group exhibited substantial and statistically significant gains in all dimensions. Post-test averages increased markedly—interest (3.0 → 4.4), confidence (3.1 → 4.5), engagement (3.1 → 4.5), and relevance (3.2 → 4.6)—with paired t-tests yielding p-values < 0.001. Effect size statistics (Cohen’s d between 0.9 and 1.2) further highlighted strong practical significance. Overall, the study underscores those experiential strategies not only enhance students’ performance but also cultivate favourable attitudes toward Physics, rendering it more relatable, accessible, and meaningful. The outcomes strongly support embedding experiential methods within science instruction to advance both affective and cognitive domains of learning.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/9/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...