Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM49789
Volume:
9 |
6 |
Jun 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
â Concrete is a widely utilized material in the construction industry, forming the foundation of numerous buildings, bridges, and infrastructure projects across the globe. Given its extensive use, concrete is often referred to as the backbone of construction. However, India faces challenges in meeting the demand for cement, a critical component of concrete, as domestic production falls short of requirements. This imbalance between supply and demand contributes to increased construction costs. To address these issues, numerous studies have explored the partial replacement of cement and sand with alternative materials. In this project, cement is partially replaced with groundnut shell ash (GSA) at 20% and metakaolin (MK) at varying levels (0%, 5%, 10%, and 15%) using M20 grade concrete with a water-cement ratio of 0.6. Five trial mixes were prepared to evaluate mechanical properties such as compressive strength, split tensile strength, ductility, and wear resistance. For each mix, four concrete cubes and four cylinders were cast. The standard cube size of 150 mm x 150 mm x 150 mm was used to assess compressive strength, while standard cylinders with a diameter of 150 mm and a height of 300 mm were tested for split tensile strength. These specimens were cured and tested at intervals of 7 and 28 days, with the results compared to those of conventional concrete. The findings analyzed both mathematically and graphically, indicate that the compressive strength and split tensile strength of the modified concrete are lower than those of conventional concrete. This study highlights the potential and limitations of using GSA and MK as partial cement replacements in concrete.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/9/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...