Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM34850

Fake Reviews Detection using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM34850

Volume:

8 |

5 |

May 2024

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/ijsrem34850

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

PAS

Prof. Aditee Salokhe

SK

Sanket Kharat

RG

Rutvik Galande

SJ

Shripad Jadhav

PD

Pratik Dhole

PD

Pranav Dahatonde

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

In recent years, the prevalence of fake reviews on online platforms has become a significant concern, as these deceptive reviews can mislead consumers and impact purchasing decisions. This research paper explores various methods for detecting fake reviews using machine learning techniques. We utilized the deceptive opinion spam dataset, which includes both truthful and deceptive hotel reviews for 20 Chicago hotels. The dataset comprises 1600 reviews, evenly split between truthful positive, deceptive positive, truthful negative, and deceptive negative reviews. Our primary objective was to classify these reviews as either truthful or deceptive using several machine learning algorithms. We constructed a data frame with columns for the review text, polarity class, and spamity class. Polarity indicates whether a review is positive or negative, while spamity distinguishes between truthful and deceptive reviews. Stopwords were removed from the reviews using the nltk package from sklearn, and text mining techniques were applied to convert text strings into numerical data. We also extracted parts of speech from the reviews to use as features in our models. We experimented with four classification techniques: Naïve-Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, and Random Forest classifiers. The Naïve-Bayes classifier, specifically the Multinomial NB algorithm, achieved an accuracy of 89.13%. The SVM yielded an accuracy of 82.155%, while the Decision Tree algorithm resulted in an accuracy of 65.55%. The Random Forest classifier demonstrated the highest accuracy, reaching 91.72%. Confusion matrices, generated using the sklearn metric module, validated the accuracy of each algorithm. Given the superior performance of the Random Forest classifier and Naïve-Bayes, these models were selected for further analysis. Our findings indicate that these machine learning techniques can effectively identify fake reviews, thereby helping to mitigate their misleading impact on consumers. For future work, we aim to expand our study to include datasets from other platforms such as Amazon and flipakrt, and to explore different feature selection methods. We also plan to apply sentiment classification algorithms using various tools like Python, R, Statistical Analysis System (SAS), and Stata, to detect fake reviews and evaluate the performance of these tools. This research was supported by the Technical University of Kerala. We extend our gratitude to our colleagues for their expertise, which significantly aided the research, although they may not concur with all the interpretations presented in this paper. Through this study, we contribute to the ongoing efforts to enhance the reliability of online reviews and protect consumers from deceptive practices.

KEYWORDS

Cite This Article

Prof. Aditee Salokhe, Sanket Kharat, Rutvik Galande, Shripad Jadhav, Pratik Dhole, Pranav Dahatonde, "Fake Reviews Detection using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 8, no. 5, May 2024. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem34850

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/27/2024

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

0

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...