Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM52669
Volume:
9 |
9 |
Sep 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Email scams, such as phishing and business email compromise, are real threats to individuals and organizations, which in most cases easily evade conventional filters by leveraging on trust and slight aberrations. This paper proposes a fraud detection framework that is based on anomalies which couples cutting-edge parsing of email with risk scoring to identify suspicious messages. First, we create a strong email parsing and preprocessing pipeline through tools such as pypff (for Outlook .pst archives), Beautiful Soup (for HTML content cleaning), and regular expressions to parse and sanitize email content, headers, and metadata. Second, we create a hybrid risk scoring model that blends machine learning – specifically Logistic Regression and Decision Trees – with rule-based heuristics. The model predicts a continuous risk value between 0 (benign) and 100 (highly suspicious) for every email. A proof-of-concept application was created to test the method on a live email dataset. The system processed hundreds of emails successfully and detected high-risk anomalies, and the supervised model was successful in identifying fraudulent emails with high accuracy (over 90% on test data). This report outlines methodology, implementation, and results, illustrating the efficacy of a hybrid parsing and scoring approach for augmenting email fraud detection. The findings highlight the importance of blending data-driven models with expert rules in recognizing malicious emails early on, and we explain how this paves the way for more advanced email forensics dashboards in subsequent work.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
9/18/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...