Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM39083
Volume:
8 |
11 |
Nov 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Stroke is one of the principal causes of mortality and disability internationally, with a more significant burden in third-world countries. Stroke survivors show various long-term sequelae, including motor defects, hemineglect, aphasia and limb weakness. Stroke is also associated with cognitive and emotional disturbances, which may complicate the process of recovery. Rehabilitation, therefore, is one of the most critical aspects of post-stroke care. Rehabilitative measures function on the principle of neuroplasticity, where repeated neural feedback promotes functional recovery. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are external devices that allow communication between the user and external devices through invasive or non-invasive methods. Direct transmission between the user and the external machine can allow for real-time neural feedback, accelerating recovery. BCIs show potential not only in motor rehabilitation but also in emotional and cognitive recovery post-stroke. Myoelectric Prosthetics (MPs) are external devices that use surface electromyography (sEMG) signals to assist motor movement and rehabilitate affected limbs. Upper limb MPs are used mainly to improve fine motor function by providing real-time proprioceptive feedback to the patient. Lower limb MPs give patients mechanical assistance along with improvements to gait and speed. Even though technical limitations exist in both BCIs and MPs, they show immense rehabilitative potential in stroke survivors. This review aims to throw light on the burden of stroke, the state of current rehabilitative care, and the use of MPs and BCIs for stroke neurorehabilitation.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/26/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...