Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM41155
Volume:
8 |
12 |
Dec 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study examines the Indian government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Nagpur, Maharashtra, with a focus on the experiences and perspectives of government officers and employees in both urban and rural areas. Using a mixed-methods design, the research integrates quantitative surveys of 200 personnel with qualitative interviews and focus group discussions, providing a comprehensive understanding of pandemic management at the grassroots level. Findings reveal significant differences in confidence levels, perceived responsibilities, and resource availability between urban and rural officials. Urban areas benefited from better infrastructure, enabling smoother vaccination drives and lockdown enforcement, while rural officers faced challenges such as inadequate healthcare facilities, logistical constraints, and limited public awareness. Despite these barriers, respondents demonstrated a strong sense of responsibility and involvement in implementing government initiatives, including vaccination campaigns, quarantine measures, and relief distribution. The study highlights gaps in communication and coordination within the government system, emphasizing the need for improved real-time communication tools, decentralized decision-making, and context-specific strategies. Insights from this research underscore the importance of strengthening rural healthcare systems, empowering frontline workers, and adopting integrated policy frameworks to enhance preparedness for future health emergencies. Overall, the findings provide actionable recommendations to build a more resilient and inclusive public health governance model.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/25/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
13
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...