Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM52076
Volume:
9 |
8 |
Aug 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In the current digital era, most patients depend on online reviews to make well-informed choices when selecting a hospital for their treatment. These reviews frequently provide valuable insights regarding hospital services, patient care, and overall experiences. Nevertheless, the vast number of patient reviews complicates the manual analysis and extraction of meaningful conclusions. Sentiment analysis, a subset of Natural Language Processing (NLP), presents an effective solution to this challenge by automating the extraction of subjective information from text. This project, entitled “Hospital Recommendation using Sentimental Analysis”, seeks to create an automated system capable of analyzing patient reviews for hospitals and offering recommendations based on the sentiments expressed in those reviews. The system utilizes machine learning algorithms to categorize reviews into positive, negative, or neutral sentiments, thereby delivering valuable insights into public perception. By employing text mining techniques and sophisticated NLP methods, the system will scrutinize unstructured data from hospital reviews, empowering patients to make more informed decisions based on the perspectives of others. The foundation of the system comprises two main components: Sentiment Analysis and Recommendation System. The Sentiment Analysis model categorizes the review text into sentiment classifications, while the Recommendation System proposes hospitals that have garnered the most favorable reviews. Furthermore, the system will integrate patient preferences such as treatment type and location to enhance the personalization of hospital recommendations.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/24/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...