Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM54227

How Our Moral Compass Shapes Well-Being: Exploring How ‘Good,’ ‘Right,’ and ‘Ought’ Influence Mental Health

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM54227

Volume:

9 |

11 |

Nov 2025

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM54227

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

RP

Ratan Pramanick

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

This study examines how distinct moral value orientations—good, right, and ought—shape psychological well-being and mental health outcomes across diverse adult populations. While ethical frameworks have long guided human judgment and behavior, their differential cognitive and emotional consequences remain understudied. Drawing on moral philosophy, social psychology, and clinical research, we conceptualize the orientation toward the good as grounded in compassion, flourishing, and prosocial intention; the orientation toward the right as rule-based, justice-focused, and anchored in duty or fairness; and the orientation toward the ought as obligation-driven, often experienced as internalized expectations or moral pressure. Using a mixed-methods comparative design (N = 46), we evaluated how these orientations predict markers of mental health, including anxiety, depressive symptoms, resilience, and life satisfaction. Quantitative analyses revealed that individuals primarily oriented toward the good exhibited significantly higher well-being and resilience, suggesting that value systems centered on compassion and human flourishing correlate with more adaptive emotional regulation. In contrast, a strong orientation toward the ought was associated with elevated anxiety and self-critical rumination, indicating that obligation-centric ethics may heighten vulnerability to stress. The right orientation produced mixed outcomes, supporting fairness and coherence in decision-making while sometimes amplifying rigidity under moral conflict. Qualitative interviews deepened these findings, revealing that the felt tone of each orientation—expansive for good, structured for right, and demanding for ought—fundamentally shapes lived experience. Overall, results highlight the ethical compass as an important psychological construct and suggest that cultivating value orientations Emphasizing compassion over coercive obligation may support healthier mental functioning.

KEYWORDS

moral value orientation ethical compass good–right–ought mental health resilience obligation‑based morality

Cite This Article

Ratan Pramanick, "How Our Moral Compass Shapes Well-Being: Exploring How ‘Good,’ ‘Right,’ and ‘Ought’ Influence Mental Health," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 9, no. 11, Nov 2025. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM54227

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

11/20/2025

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...