Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM55715
Volume:
9 |
12 |
Dec 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The accurate estimation of financial loss is the fundamental objective of modern actuarial science and credit risk management. Traditional parametric models, specifically Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), have historically provided a balance between predictive utility and structural transparency. However, the contemporary landscape of high-dimensional data, characterized by non-linear interactions and structural anomalies such as zero-inflation and heavy tails, necessitates the adoption of advanced computational frameworks. This report provides an exhaustive investigation into the application of machine learning (ML) ensemble techniques to improve loss prediction accuracy. The analysis encompasses a detailed examination of bagging, boosting, and stacked generalization architectures, with a specific focus on their capacity to handle the unique distributional traits of financial loss data. By synthesizing research on gradient boosting libraries—including XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost—this study evaluates the mathematical implementation of Tweedie loss functions and hurdle models. Furthermore, the report explores the integration of hybrid resampling techniques to address class imbalance and the deployment of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to reconcile the “black box” nature of ensembles with regulatory requirements. The evidence suggests that multi-tiered stacking and specialized boosting architectures significantly outperform individual learners and traditional regressions, provided that hyperparameter optimization and distributional constraints are rigorously maintained through systematic optimization protocols such as GEM-ITH.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/26/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...