Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREMWP671
Volume:
9 |
5 |
May 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The growing deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in different applications requires immediate solutions to protect them from prompt injection attacks. Attackers exploit prompt injection techniques to manipulate model responses while bypassing security protocols so they can extract sensitive information by creating specific prompt inputs. InjectAI operates as a complete automated penetration testing tool for command-line interfaces which checks web- based LLM chatbots for prompt injection flaws. The automated testing system InjectAI employs various attack strategies through systematic prompt generation and injection to detect prompt injection vulnerabilities in web-based LLM chatbots. Static injection, rule-based mutation, response-based adaptation, token manipulation, context injection and grammar obfuscation are included in its attack strategies. Through HTTP requests the tool sends dynamically generated prompts to LLM-based interfaces while replacing predefined placeholders (PRMT). The system checks response data to find security holes before it records successful injection attacks. This paper presents the design of InjectAI alongside its attack methods and evaluation process for detecting prompt injection threats. This paper empahsis on how automated security testing affects LLM safety and presents possible approaches to strengthen AI model robustness.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/19/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...