Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM55927
Volume:
10 |
1 |
Jan 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Climate change has reshaped global financial systems by altering risk structures, capital flows, and investment priorities. Three financial mechanisms—climate-risk insurance, green bonds, and carbon markets—have become central in supporting climate adaptation, mitigation, and resilience. Yet, despite their interdependence, scholarly work seldom analyses them together as components of a unified climate-finance ecosystem. This paper proposes a conceptual and empirical framework integrating these three instruments. We investigate how insurance mechanisms address climate-induced physical risks, how green bonds mobilize large-scale sustainable investment, and how carbon markets incentivize decarbonisation. Using a multi-layered comparative analysis, we evaluate risk–return characteristics, regulatory differences, institutional adoption, and cross-instrument linkages. Case studies from Europe, India, and emerging markets illustrate how these instruments behave under different policy settings. We also develop a systems-level model demonstrating feedback loops: insurance pricing affects carbon-intensive sectors’ premiums; carbon markets influence decarbonisation pathways, altering the creditworthiness of green-bond-financed projects; and green investments reduce long-term insurance claims by lowering physical risk exposure. Findings suggest that integrated deployment of these instruments accelerates climate resilience, enhances pricing efficiency, and reduces systemic financial instability. Policy implications include the need for harmonized taxonomies, improved risk disclosure frameworks, and blended finance structures. The paper concludes with a research agenda for modeling cross-instrument financial flows and quantifying climate-induced tail risks.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...