Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54021
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This research examines the integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in educational settings through the lens of educator perspectives. As tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and other large language models become increasingly prevalent, understanding how educators perceive, adopt, and integrate these technologies is critical for effective implementation. We conducted a comprehensive mixed-methods study involving 285 educators from K-12 and higher education institutions across six countries. Through online surveys and semi-structured interviews, we assessed awareness levels, sentiment patterns, adoption barriers, and key factors influencing educator attitudes toward generative AI. Our findings reveal that 91% of educators are aware of generative AI tools, with 68% having experimented with them in professional contexts. Sentiment analysis indicates cautious optimism (mean score: 3.7/5), with educators recognizing potential benefits for personalized learning, content creation, and administrative efficiency while expressing concerns about academic integrity, equity, and pedagogical soundness. Regression analysis identified technological self-efficacy, institutional support, and perceived usefulness as primary positive predictors of adoption, while ethical concerns and fear of job displacement emerged as significant barriers. The study contributes actionable insights for policymakers, administrators, and educational technology developers. We recommend comprehensive professional development programs, establishment of clear ethical guidelines, and creation of supportive institutional frameworks that balance innovation with academic integrity. These findings provide a foundation for evidence-based decision-making as educational institutions navigate the transformative potential of generative AI.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/15/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...