Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM48274
Volume:
9 |
5 |
May 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The evolving demands of modern construction, especially in corrosive and high-performance environments, have led to the exploration of alternative reinforcement materials beyond traditional steel. This research investigates the mechanical behavior, bond performance, and environmental durability of High Yield Strength Deformed (HYSD) steel bars and Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars, with the aim of understanding their comparative strengths and limitations in reinforced concrete applications. A comprehensive experimental program was carried out, including tensile strength tests, flexural performance evaluations, and pullout tests to assess the bond characteristics between the bars and concrete. HYSD steel bars, known for their excellent ductility and well-established structural reliability, were used as the benchmark. GFRP bars demonstrated significantly higher tensile strength but lower modulus of elasticity, resulting in reduced stiffness and ductility, which are critical for energy dissipation and crack control in structural elements. Furthermore, the study investigated the effects of accelerated environmental exposure, simulating aggressive conditions such as moisture, temperature variations, and chemical attacks. Pullout tests post-exposure revealed a notable reduction in bond strength for GFRP-reinforced specimens, underscoring the importance of understanding long-term durability. Despite this, the non-corrosive nature of GFRP bars presents a substantial advantage in structures exposed to marine or chemically aggressive environments. The findings highlight the trade-offs between the two reinforcement materials: HYSD steel remains superior in terms of ductility and bond reliability, whereas GFRP offers enhanced corrosion resistance and tensile strength. The research concludes that while GFRP bars have the potential to replace steel in specific applications, further refinement in bond performance and design approaches is essential for their broader adoption in structural engineering. The study recommends ongoing research and development of design standards to support the safe and efficient integration of GFRP bars in reinforced concrete systems.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/19/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...