Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54629
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is becoming increasingly prevalent among cancer patients, yet there are gaps in communication between patients and healthcare providers . This cross-sectional study examined perceptions of patient and physician toward CAM integration in oncology care among breast cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A total of 100 breast cancer patients undergoing cisplatin therapy in Gujarat, India, were enrolled with 25 oncology healthcare professionals. Structured questionnaires were used for assessing CAM awareness, usage patterns, communication behaviors, and attitudes toward integration. Results revealed that 76% of patients used at least one CAM modality, with yoga (54%), dietary supplements (48%), and Ayurvedic medicines (42%) being most common. However, only 38% disclosed CAM use to their oncologists. Barriers to disclosure included fear of disapproval (48%), perception that physicians were uninterested (35%), and lack of physician inquiry (52%). Healthcare professionals demonstrated mixed attitudes, with 64% acknowledging potential benefits for symptom management but 72% expressing concerns about herb-drug interactions and lack of evidence. There were significant gaps between patient expectations and physician knowledge regarding CAM therapies. Both groups agreed that better integration frameworks, evidence-based guidelines, and improved communication protocols are essential. The study concludes that bridging the perception gap through enhanced education, structured communication strategies, and integrative care models can optimize cancer care outcomes while respecting patient autonomy and holistic treatment preferences.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/28/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...