Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54862
Volume:
9 |
12 |
Dec 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study looks into how well performance appraisal systems work in the retail industry, paying attention to what employees think and the tools used to evaluate their work. Performance appraisals are organized ways to check on what employees do well, find areas they can improve, and make sure their efforts match the goals of the company. Using data from 109 people, the research shows that between 70% and 80% of employees are either satisfied or very satisfied with the current appraisal methods. The study finds that these systems help improve job performance, increase efficiency, and motivate workers by setting clear expectations and giving helpful feedback. It also points out that appraisals support career growth, as employees recognize how they help build skills and personal development. However, the research also points out some challenges, like biases and personal opinions affecting the appraisal process. To overcome these, the study suggests using new methods such as 360-degree feedback and ongoing performance management. These approaches offer a more complete and fair way to assess performance while promoting open communication and employee involvement. The study also recommends making the appraisal process more efficient to save time and make it more effective. By letting employees take part in setting goals and encouraging them to evaluate their own work, companies can build trust and make the appraisal system feel fairer. In the end, the study says that performance appraisals are important for connecting employee performance with company goals, boosting motivation, and creating a better work environment. It suggests combining feedback from different sources, providing regular coaching, and moving to continuous performance reviews to tackle problems and support long-term success.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/11/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...