Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM43083
Volume:
9 |
3 |
Mar 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Phishing is defined as a cyber-attack which uses social engineering via digital means to persuade victims to disclose their personal information, such as their password or credit card number. In the end, the stolen personal information is used to defraud the trust of regular websites or financial institutions to obtain illegal benefits. Although different solutions have been exercised against phishing, phishing attacks have dramatically increased in the past few years. Some solutions are based on the features extracted by rules, and some of the features need to rely on third-party services, which will cause instability and time-consuming issues in the prediction service. This project proposes PhishWiper a deep learning framework that uses Predictive Attention Model with Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) to detect phishing links in a real-time web browsing environment using URL and HTML features. PhishWiper uses two separate deep networks, URLBlock and HTMLBlock, are separately trained and combined through a concatenation layer by eliminating the output layers of each to produce a final decision. This method examines the URL and HTML of webpages and computes their similarity with known phishing websites, in order to classify them. Phishing detection is a binary classification task that contains two classes: legitimate and phishing. We have implemented the framework as a browser plug-in capable of determining whether there is a phishing risk in real-time when the user visits a web page and gives a warning message. From the experimental results, it is observed that the proposed model achieved a significant performance when evaluated with different datasets with an accuracy of ranging from 96.79% to 98.90%.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/26/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...