Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56280
Volume:
10 |
1 |
Jan 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The reconceptualisation of the right to a clean and healthy environment as a standalone fundamental human right represents a seismic shift in international and domestic jurisprudence, reframing ecological imperatives as non-negotiable entitlements integral to human dignity. This comprehensive analytical study traces the doctrinal metamorphosis—from Stockholm 1972’s nascent linkages through UNHRC Resolution 48/13 (2021), UNGA 76/300 (2022), and the ICJ’s transformative 2024 advisory opinion—juxtaposed against constitutional evolutions, with India’s Article 21 serving as paradigmatic. Grounded in 2026 data—9.4 million pollution deaths (Lancet), 95 million climate-displaced (UNHCR), IPBES’s 1 million species extinction forecast—the paper elucidates environmental rights’ indivisibility from first-, second-, and third-generation entitlements. Employing doctrinal, comparative, and empirical methodologies, it dissects seminal jurisprudence (Subhash Kumar , KlimaSeniorinnen ), institutional architectures (NGT, ECtHR), and enforcement pathologies (71% unimplemented NGT orders [CAG 2025]). Objectives encompass conceptual reconstruction, global-national dialectics, efficacy audits, impediment typologies, and prescriptive architectures. Critical findings expose aspirational affirmations undermined by implementation chasms, corporate impunity, North-South inequities, and anthropocentric legacies. The analysis advocates ecocentric constitutionalism, transnational rights litigation, just transition imperatives, and AI-enhanced monitoring. By bridging normative ambition with remedial realism, this reconceptualisation charts pathways operationalising clean environments as lived human rights amid polycrisis—biodiversity collapse, 1.2°C breach, sixth extinction—securing intergenerational justice.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
1/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...