Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM34476
Volume:
8 |
5 |
May 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study explores the use of nitrogen (N2) injection to rejuvenate inactive wells and enhance reservoir productivity. We analyze the mechanism of N2 injection and its effectiveness in stimulating production from dormant wells through case studies and field applications. Our findings highlight the cost-effectiveness and environmental benefits of N2 kickoff in extending the life of mature reservoirs and maximizing hydrocarbon recovery. By examining operational conditions such as gas injection rate and pressure, we identify optimal conditions using Wellflo® simulations. Key factors like water cut, reservoir pressure, gas oil ratio, and productivity index (J) are considered to predict production outcomes. A new metric, the Optimum Economic Factor (OEF), assesses the efficiency of each operation based on production rate, operation length, and nitrogen usage. Our decision matrix, incorporating all examined factors, reveals trends: higher gas injection rates are needed for wells with higher water cut, lower gas oil ratio, lower productivity index, and lower reservoir pressure. We also studied the effects of wellhead pressure, well depth, and coiled tubing size, finding increased frictional pressure gradients with larger coiled tubing. Optimizing nitrogen unloading operations can significantly reduce costs, particularly by paying for coiled tubing packages on an hourly basis instead of daily rates. Our decision matrix facilitates planning and execution, optimizing nitrogen usage and reducing manpower requirements. Overall, our study demonstrates that proper optimization can make nitrogen unloading economically viable in mature oil fields.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45433
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...