Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:10.55041/IJSREM58134

Risk, Return and Resilience: A Comparative Study of Selected Indian Mutual Fund Categories

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

10.55041/IJSREM58134

Volume:

10 |

3 |

Mar 2026

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM58134

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

JYB

Jariwala Yatri Bharatkumar

JAS

Jangid Anil Suresh

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

The mutual fund industry in India has experienced significant growth in recent years, driven by increasing investor awareness, financial market development, and the growing preference for diversified investment instruments. Mutual funds provide investors with opportunities to participate in capital markets while benefiting from professional portfolio management and diversification across multiple financial assets. Evaluating mutual fund performance therefore becomes essential for understanding how effectively different fund categories balance risk and return under varying market conditions. The present study examines the risk–return characteristics of selected mutual fund schemes across three major categories: equity funds, debt funds, and hybrid funds. The analysis is based on secondary data collected for thirty mutual fund schemes belonging to different asset management companies. Annual return data for the period 2021–2024 were collected along with key risk indicators including standard deviation, beta, Sharpe ratio, Jensen’s alpha, and Treynor ratio. These indicators are widely used in financial performance evaluation as they measure the relationship between portfolio returns and the risks undertaken by the fund manager (Sharpe, 1966; Jensen, 1968). Using these performance measures, the study compares the average return, volatility, and risk adjusted performance of each mutual fund category. The findings indicate that equity funds generally deliver higher average returns but are associated with greater volatility and market sensitivity. Debt funds demonstrate comparatively lower returns but exhibit greater stability and lower levels of risk. Hybrid funds, which combine equity and debt instruments, display a balanced risk–return profile and moderate volatility. Overall, the results suggest that the suitability of a mutual fund category largely depends on the investor’s risk tolerance and investment objectives. While equity funds may be appropriate for investors seeking long term capital appreciation, debt funds provide stability for conservative investors, and hybrid funds offer a diversified investment approach that balances growth and risk management. The study contributes to the understanding of mutual fund performance in the Indian financial market and provides insights that may assist investors and financial advisors in making informed portfolio decisions.

KEYWORDS

Mutual Fund Performance Risk–Return Analysis Equity Funds Debt Funds Hybrid Funds Sharpe Ratio Jensen’s Alpha Treynor Ratio Portfolio Risk Investment Performance.

Cite This Article

Jariwala Yatri Bharatkumar, Jangid Anil Suresh, "Risk, Return and Resilience: A Comparative Study of Selected Indian Mutual Fund Categories," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 3, Mar 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM58134

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

3/24/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...