Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54208
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
With cyber-attacks happening more often, and 81% of data breaches caused by stolen or weak passwords [1], there is a strong need for a secure password management system built for enterprise use. This paper presents a solution designed to solve key problems in keeping credentials safe, working well with enterprise systems, and meeting security rules. The system uses AES-256 encryption in GCM mode to create secure password vaults that protect data from being read or changed without permission [2], [3]. It also uses role- based access control (RBAC) with OAuth 2.0 to give users only the access they need, helping to stop unauthorized access [6], [7]. For easier use in companies, it supports single sign-on (SSO) and works with Active Directory through SAML 2.0, making the login process smoother and faster [9], [10]. The system also includes strong auditing and reporting features like tamper-proof logs and real-time dashboards to help organizations follow security standards such as ISO 27001, ISO 27017, and NIST 800-63B [13], [14]. The system was built using a five-step plan: designing the vault, setting up RBAC, integrating with enterprise systems, adding audit tools, and deploying the final solution. Its goal is to reduce the risk of breaches by 90%, fully meet all required standards, and make login times 50% faster [1], [9], [13]. Finally, by solving issues with scalability and older systems mentioned in past studies [4], [12], this system provides a flexible and easy-to-use way for companies to manage their credentials, helping them build trust and improve how they work [11], [15].
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/20/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...