Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54426
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Seismic retrofitting greatly improves the safety and effectiveness of reinforced concrete (R.C.) buildings in earthquake-prone areas, and this study examines this phenomenon in the G+9 multiple-story concrete buildings. It examines the seismic response and the effects of two common retrofitting techniques — RCC (Reinforced Cement Concrete) Jacketing and Steel Wrapping. Using ETABS software, we carried out digital modeling and analyses, including both nonlinear static and dynamic (time history) analyses with reference to the El-Centro and Uttarkashi earthquake data. For both retrofitted and non-retrofitted scenarios, important features of the buildings, including the natural and derived (shear and axial) frequencies, lateral slip and uneven shifting (drift) of the floors and base, overall mass, and stress distribution, were assessed. The data indicated improved stiffness, overall mass, and load-carrying-ability of all retrofitted structures, and showed noticeable differences in the RCC Jacketing and Steel Wrapping techniques. For the overall retrofitting of buildings, RCC Jacketing was more effective in stiffness improvement and overall mass than Steel Wrapping. Improved strength and drift minimization were achieved, and practical applications retrofitting-system-selection of high-rise concrete structures gained based on steel wrapping development.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/24/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...