Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM43960
Volume:
9 |
4 |
Apr 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This article examines the critical role of judicial institutions in promoting and preserving free trade, with particular emphasis on inter-state trade disputes. Through analysis of landmark cases and jurisprudential trends across diverse jurisdictions, the article demonstrates how courts function as institutional safeguards against protectionism while balancing competing values of economic integration and regulatory autonomy.[3] The judiciaryâs multifaceted contributions include dismantling trade barriers, harmonizing regulatory frameworks, establishing predictable legal environments, and enhancing the legitimacy of free trade regimes.[4] Drawing on comparative perspectives from federal systems, regional trade blocs, and international tribunals, the article illuminates the dynamic interplay between judicial reasoning and economic policy.[5] While acknowledging the substantive challenges facing judicial actorsâincluding institutional capacity constraints, conceptual limitations, and political pressuresâthe analysis suggests that courts remain essential, if sometimes imperfect, guardians of open markets.[6] The article concludes that effective judicial engagement with trade disputes requires both principled legal reasoning and contextual sensitivity to the complex political economy within which free trade operates.[7] [1] Schoolar in LLM Corporate Law [2] Assistant Professor, ICFAI Law School, The ICFAI University, Dehradun [3] See, e.g., John H. Jackson, âThe Role of the Judiciary in the WTO Legal Order,â 1(1) J. Intâl Econ. L. 1 (1998). [4] Peter van den Bossche & Werner Zdouc, The Law, and Policy of the World Trade Organization (4th ed., Cambridge University Press, 2017), at 101. [5] R.C. Batra, âJudicial Activism in Economic Policy: An Analysis of Trade Dispute Resolution,â 12 Ind. J. Const. L. 45 (2015). [6] Alec Stone Sweet, âJudicialization and the Construction of Governance,â 32 Comp. Pol. Stud. 147 (1999). [7] Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, âMultilevel Governance and Judicial Protection of Free Trade,â 24 Eur. J. Intâl L. 597 (2013).
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/7/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...