Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM59038
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The software development environment has undergone an interesting paradigm shift with the emergence of artificial intelligence-based coding assistants. These tools utilize advanced machine learning techniques and natural language processing to shape the way programmers design, debug, and optimize their codes. This paper seeks to explore the underlying mechanisms of AI-based coding assistants, their real-world applications, and their impact on programmer efficiency and code quality. The methodology for conducting this research includes a comprehensive evaluation of current implementations, such as GitHub Copilot, Amazon CodeWhisperer, and ChatGPT, to identify both the benefits and challenges of AI-based coding assistants. This research will also include a quantitative performance evaluation along with a qualitative assessment of developer opinions, based on a survey of more than 500 professional developers working on various programming languages. Code quality metrics considered include cyclomatic complexity, security vulnerability, and maintainability to measure the impact of AI-based coding assistants. The key findings suggest that, although these AI assistants significantly accelerate software development processes by 35-55%, they are associated with certain concerns, such as code security, skill atrophy, and ethics. An analysis of over 10,000 code samples generated using AI revealed vulnerabilities in 15-20% of the code, with specific areas of weakness in authentication, input validation, and cryptographic code. Another key aspect is a survey conducted on developers, which revealed mixed results based on their proficiency levels, with junior developers benefiting significantly from these tools, while senior developers are concerned about skill atrophy in their team members. The key takeaways suggest that these tools are most beneficial when they are used in a manner to enhance, not replace, human expertise, which aligns with a collaborative approach to software development, a trend which this research endorses. It provides a wide array of best practice guidelines, which include code reviews, security scanning, a focus on basic programming fundamentals, and guidelines on using these tools, which are beneficial for individual developers, software organizations, and educational institutions in this ever-evolving landscape of software development with AI assistants.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/3/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...