Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54129
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
India runs on WhatsApp. Not just for “good morning” forwards, but for who wins power. We call it the WhatsApp Republic—a shadow system where a single voice note can swing a village, and a fake riot video can flip a seat. We dug into the dirt: 5,000+ messages flying during the 2019 and 2024 elections, face-to-face talks with 50 people—activists burning midnight oil in WhatsApp war rooms, farmers in UP villages glued to group alerts, city kids organizing flash mobs via polls. We followed the chain: who sent what, who believed it, who voted differently because of it. The truth? WhatsApp hands megaphones to the muted. Dalit youth in Bihar built voter drives from family groups. Women in Kerala ran silent campaigns against liquor barons. But the same walls that protect privacy trap lies inside. A doctored clip of a politician “confessing” spreads to 10 lakh people in 48 hours—no fact-check, no delete button that works. We watched trust crack. Neighbors turned on neighbors. Votes shifted in margins thin as a forward arrow. This isn’t just tech—it’s the new ballot box. And it’s broken. We end with fixes that don’t kill the app but tame the chaos: local fact-check tags, group size caps during polls, community moderators with teeth. For India—and every democracy where phones outnumber polling booths—this is the fight we can’t forward away.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/18/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...