Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54564
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Batch adsorption experiments were performed to evaluate the removal of fluoride from water using aluminium hydroxide (AHG), aluminium hydroxide monoacetate (AHGMA), and aluminium hydroxide diacetate (AHGDA) as adsorbents. The extent of fluoride removal was influenced by pH, contact time, and the amount of adsorbent used. The studies were conducted at an initial fluoride concentration of 3 ppm, with the solution maintained at pH 6.6, and subjected to 5 minutes of ultrasonication, using adsorbent doses between 0.01 and 0.1 g/L. The use of an ultrasonic bath significantly shortened the treatment duration compared with conventional mechanical stirring. Maximum fluoride uptake occurred within the pH range of 5.5–6.5. The adsorption data followed the Freundlich isotherm model, with linear relationships observed between log (x/m) and log Ce, accompanied by positive intercepts. The corresponding Freundlich constants (K and n) indicated favourable adsorption behaviour. Fluoride adsorption was initially fast and nearly proportional, before gradually slowing as equilibrium conditions were approached. The maximum adsorption capacities achieved were 17 mg/g for AHG, 27 mg/g for AHGMA, and 25 mg/g for AHGDA, confirming that the acetate-modified adsorbents exhibited enhanced performance.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/28/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...